<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>foresthillstudios.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Quad-core CPUs About to Surpass Dual-cores for Gamers</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=72</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=72#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this article by the great guys at Tom&#8217;s Hardware. I am very surprised that at least 50% of gamers do not ALREADY own quad cores. The good side of this increase? Multi-Threading games are going to be on &#8230; <a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=72">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this article by the great guys at <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/quad-core-dual-core-cpu-intel-amd,14266.html" target="_blank">Tom&#8217;s Hardware</a>. I am very surprised that at least 50% of gamers do not ALREADY own quad cores. The good side of this<br />
increase? <span id="more-72"></span>Multi-Threading games are going to be on the rise. Meaning us quad, hex and octa-core users will soon enough get some free FPS without paying a dime.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><br />
From Tom&#8217;s Hardware:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">.<br />
</span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The latest data set published in the Steam <span style="color: #000000;">Hardware &amp; Software Survey suggests</span> that processors with four cores are, five years after their introduction, ready to capture the top spot in gamer popularity.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></strong></p>
<p>Dual-core CPUs still lead the ranking with a 46.49 percent share, but the segment has declined more than 2 points from 48.71 percent in July. In contrast, quad-core processors have climbed from 41.37 percent to 45.02 percent in the same time frame. All other core counts do not play significant roles: Single-core chips are at 5.52 percent, six-core CPUs at 1.47 percent, triple-cores at 1.39 percent and eight-cores at 0.07 percent.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Intel dominates the Steam charts with a 73.90 percent, trending slightly up from July (72.72 percent), while AMD is down to 26.10 percent. Processors with clock speeds between 2.3 and 2.7 GHz account 40 percent</span> of all Intel gamers (18 percent are between 2.7 and 2.99 GHz; 13 percent are between 3 and 3.29 GHz), while 25 percent of AMD gamers use CPUs with clock speeds between 3 and 3.29 GHz, and 21 percent use processors ranging from 2.3 to 2.69 GHz.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></p>
<p>-Written By: Wolfgang Gruener</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=72</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My First Overclock</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=39</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=39#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first heard of the new line of processor’s called Bulldozer, I knew I had to have it. An 8 core CPU sounded like something I could only dream of. So I pulled up Chrome, went to TigerDirect.com and &#8230; <a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=39">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first heard of the new line of processor’s called Bulldozer, I knew I had to have it. An 8 core CPU sounded like something I could only dream of. So I pulled up Chrome, went to TigerDirect.com and added the AMD FX 8120 to my cart.<span id="more-39"></span> A nifty feature of TigerDirect is it recommends other items relative to what was just put in the cart. It did just that and I was sold. A beautiful Corsair H100 was shining on my monitor, begging a second look. I gave it the second view it so desired. I did not have the willpower to turn down the H100 CPU Water Cooler, so I bought both it and the new processor.</p>
<p><em><strong><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><br />
CAUTION: Overclock at your own risk. We do not and will not take responsibility for anything broken in the process. All overclocking referred to in this article was done after extensive research and preparation.</strong></em></p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><br />
I had been rocking an AMD Athlon II 630 x4 for about 2-3 years now and it was time for a upgrade. Two days later I was installing my glorious new CPU/Cooler combo into my build. The install was easy and was performed without any modifications to my case needed. After the short investment of time I booted up and immediately felt a difference. The speed was satisfying to say the least, but I craved more. I had a brand new water cooler doing exactly what my stock cooler could do, just a little bit better. It was time to test the processors overclock ability.  To overclock is to push a certain component’s limits farther than stock by increasing a variety of numbers through either BIOS or overclocking programs.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><br />
I wish I could say that I am versed as an overclocker. Not that I don’t know my way around the BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) or that I have trouble learning new things, it was just I always have ran stock cooler. Water cooling seemed expensive, and overclocking was almost taboo in my circle of friends. I ventured into the darkness anyways and came out a victor. Let’s start with my results and then I’ll explain how I got there.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><br />
I managed to reach 4.5Ghz (a 31% increase in Mhz from the stock 3.1Ghz) when all was said and done. If anybody plans on overclocking, I highly recommend first reading <a href="http://forums.tweaktown.com/gigabyte/46237-bulldozer-overclocking-guide-performance-scaling-charts-max-ocs-ln2-results-coming.html" target="_blank">THIS </a>Bulldozer overclock guide. It will tell everything that a new guy needs to know, and even experienced overclockers might learn a thing or two. The settings i used in my overclock are <a href="http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2259201" target="_blank">HERE</a>. The following graphs are benchmarks between my old processor, my 8120 stock, and my 8120 overclocked.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p>The first graph is using <a href="http://www.passmark.com/index.html" target="_blank">CPU Mark</a>, it is composed of 8 separate test then it gives the average score from all of them. A link to the individual explanations of the CPU Mark test can be found <a href="http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_test_info.html" target="_blank">HERE</a>. Upgrading from my Athlon to my FX provided a 56% increase in my CPU Mark score. The overclock of my FX from 3.1Ghz to 4.53Ghz yielded a 33% bonus. The gain in performance from stock Athlon to overclocked FX is a large 89%. That is what I call some good results.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-41" title="CPU Mark" src="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CPU-Mark-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="584" height="328" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><span style="color: #ffffff;">.<br />
</span><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.superpi.net/" target="_blank">Super PI</a> is a lightweight, relatively simple program. It asks the computer to figure out the value of PI from 16 thousand decimal points up to 32 million. The most widely used test is the 1 million decimal point, so I used that. Keep in mind, this is time in seconds of how long it takes to calculate on each processor. So lower is ideally better. The time decrease in percentage from my Athlon to the FX stock is 14%. From the stock Bulldozer to the overclocked, is a whopping 23%. The total increase from old to new processor is 37%<br />
</span><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;"><a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Super-PI.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-65" title="Super PI" src="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Super-PI-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="584" height="328" /></a></span><a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CPU-Mark.jpg"><br />
</a>If there are any other benchmarks you guys have in mind or just some general questions shout them out! Forest Hill Studios is ALWAYS open to new things to try and helping out. Everyone have a wonderful day ^.^.</p>
<h1></h1>
<h1></h1>
<h1></h1>
<h1></h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Higher Education Goes Digital w/ Infographic</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=36</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=36#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Apple in the education game, how do you think learning will change in the digital age? From Mashable:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Apple in the education game, how do you think learning will change in the digital age?</p>
<p>From Mashable:</p>
<p><img src="webkit-fake-url://888FE7CE-5552-4CC5-850C-E435B58B40EB/Digital-Classroom-972.jpg" alt="Digital-Classroom-972.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=36</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T: data usage has increased 20,000 percent in past 5 years!</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=32</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Verge: There&#8217;s been a lot of talk lately about the death of unlimited data, and AT&#38;T&#8217;s enforcement of throttling on users who still have unlimited plans, so a senior executive at AT&#38;T recently posted to the company&#8217;s blog detailing &#8230; <a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=32">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Verge:</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk lately about the <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/20/2718375/unlimited-data-is-dead-so-lets-fight-a-smarter-fight">death of unlimited data</a>, and AT&amp;T&#8217;s enforcement of throttling on users who still have unlimited plans, so a senior executive at AT&amp;T recently posted to the company&#8217;s blog detailing the extreme influx of data traffic the company has seen in recent years. According to John Donovan, a senior executive VP for AT&amp;T, date usage on the network has increased a whopping 20,000 percent over the last five years, with usage at least doubling every year. Of course, AT&amp;T just sold a<a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/26/2736173/at-t-posts-6-7b-loss-despite-record-setting-smartphone-sales-in-q4-2011">record number of smartphones</a> in Q4 2011, so the company&#8217;s not expecting this trend to change any time soon. Donovan also detailed the $20 million spent on network improvements in 2011 and said the company expects to spend the same in 2012. There&#8217;s some question as to <a href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/02/14/spinning-round-in-circles/" target="_blank">exactly how accurate</a> these numbers are, but AT&amp;T&#8217;s comments about its &#8220;wireless data tsunami&#8221; could be seen as an effort to deflect criticism from the caps it has been imposing on unlimited data users.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By <a href="http://www.theverge.com/users/NathanIngraham">Nathan Ingraham</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=32</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Benchmark Blowout Conclusion</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=19</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=19#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We make the Internet better]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back readers. With the tests concluded, I am in complete shock. The winner was not who I believed would come out on top, and the browser won by miles. The browser tests that I chose to use was both &#8230; <a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=19">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back readers. With the tests concluded, I am in complete shock. The winner was not who I believed would come out on top, and the browser won by miles. The browser tests that I chose to use was both PeaceKeeper for HTML 5, and Browser Mark. While I do not know what basis Browser Mark comes up with its score off of, I felt it necessary to use more than one benchmark for emphasis and the most non-biased information possible. Well, on to the scores!<br />
<span id="more-19"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The first test is with PeaceKeeper; made by FutureMark which is the same company who produces PCMark. &#8220;Peacekeeper measures your browsers performance by testing its JavaScript functionality. JavaScript is a widely used programming language used in the creation of modern websites to provide features such as animation, navigation, forms and other common requirements. By measuring a browsers ability to handle commonly used JavaScript functions Peacekeeper can evaluate its performance&#8221; &#8211; FutureMark.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p><a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/PEACEKEEPER_POINTS.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-24" title="PeaceKeeper Points" src="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/PEACEKEEPER_POINTS-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="584" height="328" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Next test is for compatibility, and measures the ability of the browser to use vaious codecs and such. There are a maximum of 7 points allowed in the compatibility test.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/browser_peacekeeper_compatibility.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-23" title="browser_peacekeeper_compatibility" src="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/browser_peacekeeper_compatibility-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="584" height="328" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The last test was Browser Mark.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p><a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/browser_mark_points-1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-20" title="Browser Mark Points" src="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/browser_mark_points-1-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="584" height="328" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>To finish this series of tests I would like to say one thing, time to switch to Google Chrome.</p>
<p>(Don&#8217;t forget to check out <a title="FutureMark" href="http://www.futuremark.com/" target="_blank">FutureMark</a> and <a title="Browser Mark" href="http://browsermark.rightware.com/browsermark/index.action" target="_blank">Browser Mark</a>!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=19</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Benchmark Blowout</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=13</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=13#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We make the Internet better]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to buy that new Operating system, yet you’re stuck at a fork in the road. A choice, 32-bit or 64-bit? What do they do? What are the differences? Don’t worry Forest Hill Studios is here to help.. .  Metaphors &#8230; <a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=13">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to buy that new Operating system, yet you’re stuck at a fork in the road. A choice, 32-bit or 64-bit? What do they do? What are the differences? Don’t worry Forest Hill Studios is here to help.<span id="more-13"></span><span style="color: #ffffff;">.<br />
. </span></p>
<p>Metaphors are nice right? Take your computer as an information highway. Data is flowing to and from it at a constant rate. To explain 64-bit in a few words, it essentially doubles the amount of traffic you can put on your highway. Article over right? Choose 64-bit, and be done? Not so fast. There are a lot of things to take into account before choosing 64-bit. To get a little bit more technical, the metaphorical highway is your RAM (Random Access Memory), and it only helps if you have more than 4 Gigabytes of it installed along with a 64-bit processor.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p>Windows 7 is the only 64-bit operating system I feel I can recommend, due to its amazing compatibility. The problem with most 64-bit operating systems is that there are not many 64-bit programs to work alongside with. Previously, if a program was not 64-bit compatible then you were out of a program and a few bucks. Luckily times are changing. There is now a program files on 64-bit operating systems that has a spot for both 32-bit software and the 64-bit counterpart. This means that any program that is Windows 7 compatible will be installed into the right folder on its own, permitting the use of it without fail.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p>This led me to my journey of trying to find a 64-bit web browser. A journey that was not easy, but worth it nonetheless. Queue entrance Waterfox. The first mainstream web browser Software Company to provide a 64-bit browser is Mozilla. A fan of Firefox any way’s, I tried it without question. I could harp all day about how much better Waterfox is as opposed to Internet Explorer, or Google Chrome; but that would be biased. It would be information I wouldn’t want to provide, as well as you guys not wanting to read. So come Monday 2/6, we will put it all to the test. We will see who manages to crawl to the top and become the winner of &#8220;The Browser Benchmark Blowout&#8221;. Try to say that three times, fast.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">. </span></p>
<p>UPDATE: We plan on posting the results later on this evening. Stay tuned and plan to be surprised, we sure were!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=13</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Internet Explorer why&#8230;why</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=9</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gilbert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We make the Internet better]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a general warning to everyone that I will have no choice but to rant and rave my complaints with the dreaded IE&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a general warning to everyone that I will have no choice but to rant and rave my complaints with the dreaded IE&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=9</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making the internet a better place</title>
		<link>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=5</link>
		<comments>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Gilbert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back to the Forest Hill Studios Blog.  We have begun the transformation of the aesthetics of the NEW Forest Hill Studios.  We have been hard at work for the past 3 months, moving, planning, building, and working unbelievably long &#8230; <a href="http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?p=5">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to the Forest Hill Studios Blog.  We have begun the transformation of the aesthetics of the NEW Forest Hill Studios.  We have been hard at work for the past 3 months, moving, planning, building, and working unbelievably long hours to lay the foundation for the beginning of the NEW Forest Hill Studios.  We encourage you to visit our newly revamped site and tell us what you think (<a title="Forest Hill Studios" href="http://www.foresthillstudios.com/" target="_blank">foresthillstudios.com</a> ).  yes mom this is where you brag.</p>
<p>We are very excited to begin showing some of the work we have been doing with some awesome companies that gave us a chance before we had this kickass website ( <a title="Portfolio" href="http://www.foresthillstudios.com/portfolio.html" target="_blank">Portfolio</a> ).</p>
<p>Check out the Projects tab, at the top of this page, where we will be talking about current projects at the studio.</p>
<p>A lot has changed with Forest Hill Studios, and more will come.</p>
<p>We invite you to watch but one day you wont have a choice.</p>
<p>FHS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foresthillstudios.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>


